Guidance, affect, and you can applicant sex within the U

101 . Newhagen , John E. , “Past mind-report: Using latency to respond to model the question answering techniques to your web-dependent public opinion surveys,” regarding Sourcebook to possess Governmental Interaction her comment is here Research , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and you can Lance Holbert , R. ( New york : Routledge , 2011 ).Google Scholar

102 . Oxley , Douglas Roentgen. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John R. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and you may Hibbing , John R. , “Governmental thinking differ having physiological attributes,” Research , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Was feminine likely to choose for ladies things costs than simply its male colleagues?” Legislative Degree Every quarter 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

104 . Swers , Michele L. , The real difference Feminine Create: The insurance policy Impact of women in the Congress ( Chi town : School away from Chi town Press , 2002 ).Google College student

105 . Slope , Kim Quaile and you will Hurley , Patricia An excellent. , “Emblematic speeches regarding U.S. Senate in addition to their representational ramifications,” Journal out-of Government 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Should blacks portray blacks and female show feminine? An effective contingent ‘yes’,” Diary out-of Government 1999 , 61 ( step three ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-related governmental studies as well as the detailed image of women,” Governmental Behavior 2003 , twenty-five : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Will there be an effective ‘gender affinity effect’ in the American government? S. Home elections,” Political Lookup Every quarter 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

This short article has been quoted from the after the e-books. This checklist is established predicated on data provided with Crossref.

Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney An excellent. and you may Crave, Ellen 2015. Can it be Gender, Religiosity otherwise One another? A task Congruity Theory away from Candidate Electability inside the Transitional Tunisia. Viewpoints into Politics, Vol. 13, Situation. step one, p. 74.

Bauer, Nichole Meters. 2015. Whom stereotypes feminine people? Determining private differences in female stereotype dependence. Government, Organizations, and Identities, Vol. step 3, Situation. step 1, p. 94.

Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “The new character out-of gender in detailed logo,” Political Search Every quarter 1995 , forty-eight : 599 – 611

McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, Young Mie Knisely, Sandra and McLeod, Douglas 2015. When women attack. Government and the Lifetime Sciences, Vol. 34, Question. step one, p. forty-two.

Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and you may Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Sending blended signals: this new character off gender and you can partisanship when you look at the studies out of political figures. Journal off Elections, Public-opinion and you can Activities, Vol. 26, Question. 4, p. 423.

Koch, Thomas and you may Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. Which have Center and you will (No) Head? Exactly how Receiver Adversely Infer Forgotten Information about Political figures as well as how This Affects the fresh Assessment of one’s Speakermunication Look, Vol. 43, Matter. seven, p. 972.

Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Deciding Attitudes away from Feminine Politicians: The situation out of Poland. Government during the Central European countries, Vol. 14, Point. step three, p. seven.

Schneider, Monica C. and Bos, Angela L. 2019. The application of Personal Part Theory towards the Study of Gender for the Politics. Political Therapy, Vol. forty, Thing. S1, p. 173.

Park, Sunrays Young and you may Baek, Younger Min 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence into the Female People in politics: As to the reasons Ambivalence Matters having Gender Equality in the a beneficial Democracy. Diary of females, Government & Policy, Vol. forty, Topic. 2, p. 309.

Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Reputation Assassination and you can Women in Government. Corvinus Diary off Worldwide Items, Vol. cuatro, Topic. 1, p. 15.

Aaldering, Loes and you may Van Der Jamais, Daphne Joanna 2020. Political Frontrunners on Media: Gender Bias when you look at the Commander Stereotypes during Campaign and Techniques Minutes. Uk Diary regarding Governmental Science, Vol. fifty, Point. 3, p. 911.

Boer, Noortje 2020. How do People Assess Path?Level Bureaucrats’ Warmth and you may Competence? An effective Typology and you will Sample. Personal Administration Review, Vol. 80, Point. 4, p. 532.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *